Choose fines ‘pseudolaw’ courtroom abuser $40,000 however doubts she’ll pay

Article content material

A millionaire heiress has been ordered to pay $40,000 for her repeated contempt of courtroom utilizing “nonsensical” so-called pseudolaw arguments.

Article content material

However the Calgary choose who levied the fines towards Sandra-Ann Anderson stated in his ruling he’s skeptical the girl pays given her document of “unreasonable, contemptuous, abusive” behaviour.

Article content material

“I know Ms. Anderson won’t ever pay these quantities voluntarily,” wrote Court docket of Queen’s Bench Affiliate Chief Justice John Rooke.

“As an alternative, she’s going to most likely assess me tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars} (or extra!), pursuant to her newest (unlawful) Price Schedule.”

Earlier this month, Rooke dominated towards Anderson in her refusal to pay $160,000 owed on the mortgage of a apartment, with the girl insisting Canadian regulation doesn’t apply to her.

Rooke famous then that Anderson was receiving a multi-million greenback inheritance from her late father’s property and added “her actions should not these of some misinformed and confused particular person, stumbling via a posh, inscrutable equipment … Ms. Anderson is an unrepentant, disruptive, grasping, uncooperative, abusive scofflaw.”

Article content material

That call handed the apartment over to the Royal Financial institution within the foreclosures case and severely restricted her entry to the Court docket of Queen’s Bench attributable to her persistent “loud” abuses of process and her use of faux regulation.

In his newest Jan. 25 choice, Rooke ordered Anderson to pay a $10,000 penalty and two $15,000 fines for 3 incidents of gross misconduct that noticed her make use of unlawful and intimidation ways towards the courtroom.

“The elevated penalties for Incidents #2 and #3 replicate the obnoxious and bullying character of Ms. Anderson’s acts,” said Rooke.

And with the probability of her recalcitrance to pay, Rooke warned Anderson her inheritance will probably be focused with additional fines, which might embrace penalties as safety for her future courtroom prices.

Article content material

The girl has not too long ago stated she’s residing in California, and Rooke in his ruling stated he wouldn’t doubt it since she’s failed to look for courtroom proceedings whereas noting she’s going through a number of arrest warrants.

Anderson’s conduct is a part of a wider phenomenon of individuals within the Canada and the U.S. refusing to acknowledge authorized jurisdictions, governments and regulation typically steeped in far-right wing conspiracy theories and rhetoric.

In Anderson’s case, Rooke cited a authorized doc forwarded by Anderson – a “writ of quo warranto” – that insists Donald Trump is the present U.S. president, that Canada is a subordinate company of the U.S. and the definition of a taxpayer is “authorized slave.”

The justice referred to the writ as “an try to have interaction in busybody litigation, and an utter waste of courtroom time.”

Within the appendix of his ruling, Rooke included a prolonged price and high-quality schedule submitted by Anderson for the cost of punitive damages to her.

“Documents of this type are nothing greater than unlawful instruments of intimidation,” wrote Rooke.

“Ms. Anderson is aware of that, however she has, as regular, ignored the regulation on that time.”

BKaufmann@postmedia.com

Twitter: @BillKaufmannjrn