Ohio Supreme Court suspends Coshocton attorney who had sex with client

Ohio Supreme Court suspends Coshocton attorney who had sex with client
  • Legal professional Kevin C. Cox has been suspended for two decades, with just one yr stayed, by the Ohio Supreme Courtroom.
  • The matter relates to Cox having sex with a shopper he was representing in a divorce case and then lying about it to authorities.
  • Cox, a law firm due to the fact 2001, was doing work for the McCleerly Law Firm at the time. He opened his individual exercise in 2020.
  • Cox experienced questioned for a public reprimand and legal schooling for inappropriate texts sent.

COSHOCTON — A Coshocton-dependent attorney has been suspended for two yrs, with a person yr stayed, by the Ohio Supreme Courtroom for having sex with a shopper and then lying about it to authorities. 

In a per curiam opinion, the court stated Kevin C. Cox violated numerous procedures governing the experienced conduct of attorneys when he had sexual intercourse with a female he was symbolizing all through her divorce.

The courtroom rejected Cox’s argument that he warrants only a community reprimand coupled with additional continuing authorized education and learning prerequisites for sending inappropriate textual content messages to his customer.

Coshocton-dependent attorney:Law firm facing sanction by Ohio Supreme Courtroom

Criticism filed:Attorney accused of owning an affair with shopper

The Tribune has remaining a concept for Cox searching for remark.

In the course of the disciplinary proceedings, Cox denied obtaining a physical sexual relationship with the girl. The courtroom observed “the evidence clearly and convincingly demonstrates” the attorney experienced a sexual romantic relationship with his client, sent her sexually billed textual content messages and emails and lied about the two features of the romantic relationship.

A criticism was filed Dec. 3, 2020, against Cox with the Board of Expert Carry out of the Ohio Supreme Courtroom. A movie teleconference was held on the issue April 22 and 23, 2021. The board unveiled its conclusions and sanction recommendations on Aug. 6, 2021. Punishment by the Ohio Supreme Court has been pending due to the fact that time. 

Ferne Dekker

Learn More →